are people really going to have little tvs, i guess maybe, MAYBE/
basically wi fi devices like tvs, won't phones just become a default app in everything?
widget aggregators are going to just be turning widgets into channels retrieving mixed media about the widget's representative company.
Print media has the benefit of the method, the invisible infrastructure of how we process the info contained within it, intentionally and via graphic design. for print to remain relevant it must be a deeply designed map to the net and or apps using the net in an overall API sense, (iphone apps, twitter), if there is value in refining the work flow of searching, THAT is valuble.
Montage channel, yes, you know how to channel surf, yes set top box grids are trudgingly evolving, (sometimes falling backwards due to being drunk on monopolized attention but when they get up they do move forward or jog on spot) however, packaged metadata, i mean there's an idea, a customizable informed start, you can pick the subject matter or just turn it on like life and look around. unfortunately skill and understanding are involved so you can't just be a specialized geek or nerd or young person with no interest in history (cause your making your gen's history. You have to actually think to contribute, it's kinda better when you do that, just a little, not a lot, just an acknowledgement somehow that you are in fact aware of the subject your leaking out about.
Montage channel, yes, you know how to channel surf, yes set top box grids are trudgingly evolving, (sometimes falling backwards due to being drunk on monopolized attention but when they get up they do move forward or jog on spot) however, packaged metadata, i mean there's an idea, a customizable informed start, you can pick the subject matter or just turn it on like life and look around. unfortunately skill and understanding are involved so you can't just be a specialized geek or nerd or young person with no interest in history (cause your making your gen's history. You have to actually think to contribute, it's kinda better when you do that, just a little, not a lot, just an acknowledgement somehow that you are in fact aware of the subject your leaking out about.
here's the new thing, i guess since no one but me reads this blog I write, no harm mentioning it.
the new industry is data management, hollywood, google and the rest of the tools of this content world, have to recognize the entertainment value of data management. In other words, searching for content has to become the most entertainment part of the content, the thrill of the chase if you will minus all the nerded out geekfestoonery of irc, codec problems and such circa 1999-2009, fuck all that shit
montage channel, where speed resolution and such rule
more to come
the new industry is data management, hollywood, google and the rest of the tools of this content world, have to recognize the entertainment value of data management. In other words, searching for content has to become the most entertainment part of the content, the thrill of the chase if you will minus all the nerded out geekfestoonery of irc, codec problems and such circa 1999-2009, fuck all that shit
montage channel, where speed resolution and such rule
more to come
So yea, if you get into an accident in a parking lot, you and the person you collaborated on the accident with are equally at fault. Its with this premise I begin my metaphor about advertising off copyright material on youtube.
let's just say there's been an awesome outbreak of pronoia amongst content owner and their lawyers and they now understand that the internet is a promotional tool that leads to more expensive sales if cultivated correctly (see the NIN Ghost $300 album that sold out in two days that never would've sold out in two days in a brick and mortar situation, nor been thought of to do as quickly in a silver cd milieu)
so content owners now realize that it's at their disadvantage to not let whomever USERS (remember them? content partnership, give me a break, like i care, whether the shit is made available legally or not, it will be there, turning off the internet is a ridiculous idea, which is why its being attempted of course, to let the two people out there who are clueless enough to think it makes sense enjoy that social apocalypse)
upload everything from everywhere.
cause the revenue generated from content already there, is like store in a mall,
the content is there
the stores in the mall are there
the customers enter through a parking lot to the mall
the users enter youtube to windowshop for the content
a sale is made in the mall: whatever 20th century scheme involved for revenue distribution for the scenario......continues
a sale is made on youtube: this is different this would be like two people rushing to get the same thing at the mall and then getting into an accident in the parking lot on the way to the store.
however, instead of an accident, it's a purchase of an item that has somehow surfaced via a video on youtube.
so regarding the licensing fee, just like a parking lot, accidents are the fault of those involved.
just like a mall, the stores are there
just like youtube the content is there
here's the best part, the vendor who has the item gets 75 percent of the sale
12.5 goes to the content owner
12.5 goes to youtube and youtube divides that up between themselves and those involved in creating the lead.
one would assume that the content made available on youtube would follow a fair use style availability. ie new releases need not apply without supervision from content owner
old dormant lifeless content, the shit they dont' care about, however that is defined, whether its the extras that will never be on tv so as to not get their shit in a knot about lowering licensing fees, the content available has to primarily be content no one is currently caring about, that gives rise to the family guy scenario to happen to varying degrees....all the fucking time.
if this makes sense to you good, if this makes no sense to you, better.
let's just say there's been an awesome outbreak of pronoia amongst content owner and their lawyers and they now understand that the internet is a promotional tool that leads to more expensive sales if cultivated correctly (see the NIN Ghost $300 album that sold out in two days that never would've sold out in two days in a brick and mortar situation, nor been thought of to do as quickly in a silver cd milieu)
so content owners now realize that it's at their disadvantage to not let whomever USERS (remember them? content partnership, give me a break, like i care, whether the shit is made available legally or not, it will be there, turning off the internet is a ridiculous idea, which is why its being attempted of course, to let the two people out there who are clueless enough to think it makes sense enjoy that social apocalypse)
upload everything from everywhere.
cause the revenue generated from content already there, is like store in a mall,
the content is there
the stores in the mall are there
the customers enter through a parking lot to the mall
the users enter youtube to windowshop for the content
a sale is made in the mall: whatever 20th century scheme involved for revenue distribution for the scenario......continues
a sale is made on youtube: this is different this would be like two people rushing to get the same thing at the mall and then getting into an accident in the parking lot on the way to the store.
however, instead of an accident, it's a purchase of an item that has somehow surfaced via a video on youtube.
so regarding the licensing fee, just like a parking lot, accidents are the fault of those involved.
just like a mall, the stores are there
just like youtube the content is there
here's the best part, the vendor who has the item gets 75 percent of the sale
12.5 goes to the content owner
12.5 goes to youtube and youtube divides that up between themselves and those involved in creating the lead.
one would assume that the content made available on youtube would follow a fair use style availability. ie new releases need not apply without supervision from content owner
old dormant lifeless content, the shit they dont' care about, however that is defined, whether its the extras that will never be on tv so as to not get their shit in a knot about lowering licensing fees, the content available has to primarily be content no one is currently caring about, that gives rise to the family guy scenario to happen to varying degrees....all the fucking time.
if this makes sense to you good, if this makes no sense to you, better.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)